Physical Activities-Legal Horizon and Sports Regulation as Lex Specialis: Lex Sportiva
نویسنده
چکیده
The physical movement and the athletic movement and, furthermore, the whole of the physical activity, are distinct from other activities due to the organization on the basis of which it is practiced, to the way it is conducted and implemented and to the objectives which it involves. The legal entities in general and the ones of the sports sector in particular have been constituted so as to cover specific social needs, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable regulations and the ones of the Constitution. In Physical Education and Sport there are many interesting legal entities, some governed by Private Law and some by Public Law. This athletic action and particularly the sports contest can be achieved only within a specific framework of rules governing the contest and of rules of law, so as for all the above mentioned issues to be regulated. The physical and the athletic activity, as sports’ manifestations, regulated by legal rules, constitute a specific cognitive field for both the sports science and the legal one. Sports rules are established in order to cover public and private interest in sport in the context of national and international sport activity. Sports rules, as the rules of the game, prevail over ordinary rules of law since they have been specially enacted for specific sports activities. The rules of ordinary law apply in sports for many issues. They may apply directly due to the lack of special sports rules or indirectly by absorption with analogous adaptation and implementation where appropriate.
منابع مشابه
The Definition of ‘Norm Conflict’ in International Law and Legal Theory
This article argues that the narrow definition of conflict apparently prevailing in international law doctrine and recent WTO rulings is inappropriate in terms of legal theory and in view of the fundamental structures of the international legal order. The problem with this strict definition is that it does not recognize that a permissive norm may conflict with a prescriptive norm. In this persp...
متن کاملApplication of Lex Mercatoria as Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration
In settling disputes regarding international commercial arbitration the parties may instead of choosing the law of one country to choose lex mercatoria or the law of merchants as a applicable law to the disputes. When this choice is possible that applicable choice of law rules recognize such power for the parties. The principle of autonomy is choosing lex mercatoria has been recognized in many ...
متن کاملOwnership of Underwater Cultural Heritage in the Area
This article addresses the ownership of Underwater Cultural Heritage (“UCH”) on the ocean floor outside of any nation’s jurisdiction (“the Area”), which was discussed, but not settled, in the two main international marine conventions: the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“1982 UNCLOS”) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (“UNESCO”) Conve...
متن کاملHierarchical Representation of Legal Knowledge with Metaprogramming in Logic
D We present an application of metaprogramming in logic that, unlike most metaprogramming applications, is not primarily concerned with controlling the execution of logic programs. Metalevel computation is used to define theories from schemata that were either given explicitly or obtained by abstraction from other theories. Our main application is a representation of legal knowledge in a metalo...
متن کاملOntology Representation - Design Patterns and Ontologies that Make Sense
legal agency classified behaviour (allowed/disallowed) responsible agent(s) social behaviour (states of affairs, stories) Commonsense Knowledge Figure 6.1: The Funtional Ontology of Law Normative knowledge reflects the regulatory nature of law, and has two functions: prescribing behaviour, and defining a standard of comparison for social reality. A norm expresses an idealisation: what ought to ...
متن کامل